<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mental Distortion &#187; David Brooks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mentaldistortion.net/tag/david-brooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mentaldistortion.net</link>
	<description>A blog about something.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:13:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Dems vs Dems? The search for a fight is on!</title>
		<link>http://www.mentaldistortion.net/2008/12/07/dems-vs-dems-the-search-for-a-fight-is-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mentaldistortion.net/2008/12/07/dems-vs-dems-the-search-for-a-fight-is-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honeymoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mentaldistortion.net/?p=32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The post-election era is less than a month old, and it seems that the media is in search of the next big story to cover.  After two years of covering a dramatic Presidential primary and general election, the media needs some sort of conflict to report on in order to increase its ratings.
The customary &#8220;honeymoon&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The post-election era is less than a month old, and it seems that the media is in search of the next big story to cover.  After two years of covering a dramatic Presidential primary and general election, the media needs some sort of conflict to report on in order to increase its ratings.</p>
<p>The customary &#8220;honeymoon&#8221; for president-elect Obama is still in effect, considering the <a title="David Brooks - New York Times" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/21/opinion/21brooks.html?_r=1&amp;em" target="brooks">positive reviews</a> in regards to his cabinet selections thus far, and his attempts at filling the leadership void in the current economic crisis less than two months before moving into the White House.  But I can&#8217;t help get the feeling that the media is sending strong hints about what conflicts they&#8217;ll be looking for once Obama assumes office on January 20.  Already <a title="CNN: Dems vs. Dems" href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/28/democrats.deadlock/" target="cnn">CNN</a> and <a title="Politico: Dems vs. Dems" href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15953.html" target="politico">Politico</a> have written about possible infighting among Democrats once they take power.  Even the headlines are very similar (ie. Dems vs. Dems)  Of course, we&#8217;ve seen <a title="1994 Elections" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Revolution" target="gop">Democrats suffer pratfalls before</a>, and it can happen again, right?  Is it what they want?  Time will only tell.  I will add articles to this post as they appear in the media regarding Democratic infighting.  My prediction is that we&#8217;ll be seeing a lot more of this, whether it&#8217;s stoking or reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mentaldistortion.net/2008/12/07/dems-vs-dems-the-search-for-a-fight-is-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

